Snooker/Billiard Table metrication

 Billiards & Snooker Goes Metric by Norman Clare

 Published in April 1970 edition of Billiards & Snooker Magazine

(Note where Norman mentions Billiard tables this encompasses Snooker Tables as well. Snooker was a game invented to be played on a Billiard table. Additional information putting this 1970 article into context and with rule book information is added at the end of the article)

We already know our British Sterling Currency is to be based on the decimal system from February 1971.

In the not very distant future we have also been warned that we are to adopt the metric system of measurements. Thus we shall purchase our potatoes by the kilogram instead of the pound and measure our distances by kilometre instead of a mile.

To some extent the metric revolution in The United Kingdom has already commenced.

This being so, the Billiard Association and Control Council(see note 1), which is the World governing body for the games of U.K. Billiards and Snooker, must soon give very careful consideration to to restating those rules which specify measurements of "UK Billiard Tables".

If, as a Nation, we are to derive the maximum advantage from changing to the metric system, it is in my opinion, important that we do not just convert our existing Imperial Measurements directly into the metric system, as to do so will result in measurements running into four decimal places. This would be extremely difficult to remember and certainly difficult for a referee to check if they decided to do so.

Ideally, we should if possible specify measurements based on the multiples 5 and 10. It would be an easy matter to adopt new measurements which varied slightly from the old if the article with which we were concerned had a serviceable life of something like 10 years. Articles made to the old specification would soon be worn out and replaced by those in the new metric sizes. However as this is not the case with Billiard tables we are faced with a really difficult problem; one which will not be made any easier when one remembers how extremely conservative the average U.K. person really is.

In the specification of a Billiard table, as published in the B.A & C.C. Rules, there are in fact only two official sizes of billiard table; the 12ft Standard table with a slate bed measuring 12ft long x 6ft 1 ½ inches wide and a B.A. & C.C. 6 ft. table with a slate bed 6ft. Long x 3ft 1 ½ ins. wide.(see note 2)

Thus all the other many 'undersize' tables which exist are quite 'unofficial'. Furthermore, although the 6ft standard table has been specified in the rules for many years , only an extremely small percentage of existing 6ft tables conform to the official measurements. In view of this I would suggest that Rule No. 1Aspecifying the size of a standard 6ft. Table is simply eliminated from the rule book. This would not result in any problems at all, as there are no official Championships played on the standard 6ft.Billiard table.

As far as the 12ft Standard (full size) Billiard table is concerned, the size of the pocket openings require no alteration as the rules simply specify that"the pocket openings shall conform to the templates authorised by the B.A. & C.C."

The balls do not present any tremendous difficulty. The existing rules state that the balls shall have a diameter of 2 1/16 inches , "within manufacturers tolerances" (what ever that means!) and that they shall be of equal size and weight. A straight direct conversion is probably the best answer. This would result in a ball size being specified as being 52.3875mm (52.5mm)

We cannot very easily achieve the multiple of 5 or 10as this would result in either a 50mm. which is fractionally less that 2 inches or 55mm which is almost 2 3/16 inches. Any other decision, such as increasing the size of the ball in order that we might come closer to the American size of 2 ¼ inches diameter, in order to facilitate International Snooker competitions, would result in almost every existing Billiard table requiring major modifications to the cushions. Indeed, completely new cushions would be required as the height of the cushion nose above the playing surface of the table would need to be considerably increased.

The only other accessory which has a specified measurement is a cue, which to conform with rule 2A must not be less than 3ft. Long It really would not do any harm at all if this rule was altered so that the minimum length of 1 meter was specified. The actual result of so doing would be to increase the minimum length by approximately 3 ½ inches but apart from one exciting occasion many years ago before the minimum length of cue was specified in the rules, when Alec Brown used a cue only a few inches long to play a stoke. I think it is safe to say that nobody would be at all worried if the minimum length was specified at 1 meter.

Let us now list those measurements which refer to the table itself - followed by direct metric conversions in brackets:-

The bed of the table must measure 12ft long x 6ft 1 ½ ins wide (365.76cms x 186.69cms)

The edge of the cushion shall project over the edge of the slate bed not less that 1 ½ ins or more than 2 ins.(not less than 3.81cms or more than 5.08cms)

The height of the Billiard Table from the floor to the top of the cushion rail shall be not less than 2ft 9 ½

ins. nor more than 2ft 10 ½ ins. (not less than 85.09 cm, nor more than 87.63cms)

The baulk line 29ins. From the face of the bottom cushion (73.66cms)

The spot 12 ¾ ins. Below the face of the top cushion (32.385cms.)

Clearly the above measurements, when converted directly into metric measurements resulting figures which require "rounding off" and so now at last we arrive at the point where real arguements commence.

Before we get too deeply involved I think we should immediately recognise that the job has to be tackled sensibly. Clearly the many thousands of existing tables will have to be accepted as they now stand so far as their "construction" is concerned but it should be possible to rationalise the baulk line and spot positions gradually over a relatively short period of time. During this period either the old or the new rationalised measurements wood need to be accepted without the table being "disqualified".

Before anybody should immediately take me to task for such a suggestion, may I point out that there is already a tolerance in the rules, which permits the cushion to project over the edge of the table(slate)bed not less than 1 ½ ins and not more than 2 ins.

Taking note of this tolerance at both sides and both ends of the tabble, we already have a situation where you can have a difference in length of the playing surface of up to 1 inch (2.54cm)and also in the width of the playing surface of up to 1 inch (2.54cm) without either table contravening the rules. We have lived with this tolerance for as many years as I can remember. Thus I submit some tolerance in the baulk and spot positions might be accepted whilst we fall in line with the nearest and most convenient metric measurements. Indecently it would be interesting to try and find out how the spot position ever came to be specified as 12 ¾ inches, why not 13 inches or perhaps even the convenient measurement of one foot?No doubt at some time in the past, there must have been many heated arguments about this particular measurement and it seems to be that there must have been some degree of compromise. Otherwise how else could such and inconvenient measurement been selected?

Now I come to my most controversial suggestion. Whilst changes in rules are being introduced to accomodate metric measurements, I think the opportunity should be taken of specifying the actual length and width of the playing area taking the measurements from the face of the cushion instead of specifying the length and the width of the table(slate)bed, followed by the permitted variations in the projection of the cushion over the edge of the(slate)bed. Such changes would give the Billiard table maker more latitude in the design and construction, and method of fixing the cushion rails. Dare I suggest that the length of the playing surface should be 3.5 meters(3.5 meters equals approximately 11ft 6ins) by 1.75 meters wide (1.75mts equals approximately 5ft 9 ins) and bearing in mind that the majority of existing Billiard tables have cushions which project the maximum 2 inches over the edge of the slate bed, the existing playing surface measuring within the face of the cushions measures 11ft 8ins by 5ft 9 ½ inches.

Thus my suggested metric full size Billiard tables would have a playing area in width just about ½ inch narrower than the existing and 2 inches shorter. The great advantage would be that the width would be exactly half the length so each half of the Billiard table would be an exact square.

Both the old table made to the imperial measurements and the new table made to the Metric measurements would have to be accepted as standard full size tables for all purposes for a very long time into the future.

I do not think that the relatively small differences between the two sizes would be noticed by the vast majority of players and as there is already an existing tolerance of 1 inch in both the length and width, I think we could accept the necessary tolerances in order that we can "go metric".

In my opinion we cannot just ignore the problem and hope it will disappear. I am very well aware that the Billiard table, once manufactured, last for 100 years or more and so it is thus very easy to make excuses for not doing anything about the problem now. But, any activity which does not move with the times to keep itself up to date will ultimately die and so those of us today who have some responsibility in these matters must not allow the situation to go be default.

Notes & additional information :-

(1) The Billiard Association & Control Council changed its title to the Billiard & Snooker Control Council sometime between 1970 and 1974. Perhaps the name change was influnced by the BBC 'Pot Black' programs which commenced in 1969 and brought the game of Snooker to a wider global audience.

(2) The B.& S.C.C. rule books upto 1977 only had the 'Imperial Standard table' measurments. It should be noted that when the original specifications table were drawn up the cushion nose projection was 1 ½ inches which meant that the playing area (between the cushion noses) was 11ft 6ins. by 5ft 10 ½ inches. Which meant that each half of the playing area was an exact square. Which is also true for American Pool tables and European Carom Tables and what Norman achieved with his suggested Metric conversion. However when the 2 inch cushion nose projection was allowed this destroyed that geometric shape on Uk Billiard tables. Norman was therefore trying to correct this anomaly with his metric suggestion. Just in passing the 2 inch cushion nose projection was probably adopted as it "improved" the appearance of the cushion by giving the impression of more cushion rubber being used!!

(3) The 1978 B.& S.C.C. Rule book has both Imperial & metric StandardTables. Susquently even the Imperial measurements were based on the playing area rather than the slate size. This was stated as 11ft 8 ½ inches long by 10ft 5 inches wide with a tolerance of +/- ½ inch.

BSCC1978 rules 

 

Playing Area specified in Imperial measurements in the 1984 B.& S.C.C.rules

Rules B&SCC 1984

WPBSA srules 1993

So from the above entries it seems that some time between 1978 and 1984 the B.& S.C.C. Revised the imperial specification so that the playing area was stipulated rathe than the slate bed and cushion nose projection. The last rule book that we have in the collection that list the "Standard Metric" table is a WPBSA 1993 one.

The major table makers in the mid 1970 did start to make their full size tables to the metric specification but as the 1980's were the time when numerous Snooker halls were opened new table makers were not aware of the "Rules" and just copied existing 'old' tables. Thus the metric tables were swamped by the numerous other makers and basically are no longer made. However quite a number ofmetric tablesare in play and as Norman mentioned in his article that tables will be arround for a long number of years so must still be considered as "Standerd Full Size Tables"!!

© Norman Clare 2007; ©E.A. Clare & Son Ltd. 2014; ©Peter N. Clare 2014

©Reproduction of this article allowed only with the permission from E.A. Clare & Son Ltd.